M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick Maraschino, Much? dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.6 (2,318)·Red · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)· 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Berry rather than red· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Berry rather than red · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Ulta Beauty Collection Luxe Satin Lipstick in Red Carpet Red 320, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Maraschino, Much?. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMaraschino, Much?Closest shade matchRed Carpet Red 320How they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%92#bd0649#c11d4eVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall59
Finish55%26SatinShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than satin
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity60%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 80/100Shade match 95/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revlon Super Lustrous Ultra Lipstick in Heatwave, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Maraschino, Much?. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMaraschino, Much?Closest overall alternativeHeatwaveHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall74
Colour60%57#bd0649#bb1735Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%—not comparableSatinNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall76
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 81/100Shade match 74/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $10 more
Sephora
