M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick Lovers Only dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.6 (2,318)·Pink · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Berry rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Berry rather than pink · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Maybelline SuperStay Ink Crayon Lipstick in Be Bold, Be You, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Lovers Only. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLovers OnlyClosest matchBe Bold, Be YouHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall98
Colour60%96#a1033e#9d1541Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared78
Finish55%78SatinMatteCloseMatte finish rather than satin
Opacity45%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall76
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 88/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $14 more
