M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick Myth dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.6 (2,318)·Nude · Neutral · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: satin· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Peach rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Peach rather than nude · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$6.49$12.99Ulta Beauty$18.51 less (74%)4.1 (18,785)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
26
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Dior Rouge Dior Lipstick in 219 Rose Montaigne, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Myth. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMythClosest match219 Rose MontaigneHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall85
Colour60%85#f0927b#ed9788Close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall100
Finish55%100SatinSatinSameSame satin finish
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared70
Longevity60%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 87/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.