M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick Grapefruit Pucker dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.6 (2,318)·Pink · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$13Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (48%)4.2 (9,047)
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: satin· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Shimmer rather than satin (finish)· 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: satin· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Revlon Super Lustrous Ultra Lipstick in Bermuda, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Grapefruit Pucker. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGrapefruit PuckerClosest matchBermudaHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall91
Colour60%93#fe738a#fe6f82Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumLightCloseDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%60WarmNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%—not comparableSatinNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall76
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 91/100Shade match 91/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (52%)
Sephora
Walmart
