Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 Fair 2 dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.2 (355)·Very fair · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Extra light with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$41 less (84%)4.5 (40,486)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$41 less (84%)4.5 (40,486)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same light coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for very fair skin with olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair to light skin with cool, pink or rosy undertones
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Ultra Fair skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Very light with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Does not claim colour stability· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very fair with golden undertones
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (49%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (51%)4.3 (49)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
49
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: neutral fair with yellow undertones
$45Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (8%)4.3 (1,324)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim 16-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
49
Wear & performance
73
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Retailer shade note: level-two fair with a warm undertone
$38Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (22%)4.4 (657)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair with warm yellow undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very fair, warm-neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: L0 - very light with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
80
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
80
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim 12-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Fair shade with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
30
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
The closest shade to Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 Fair 2 (Very fair · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Milani Conceal + Perfect Blur Out Skin Tint Stick in 001, against Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Fair 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair 2Closest shade match001How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#f1dab7#f2d8b7Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 80/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Chanel LES BEIGES Healthy Glow Foundation Hydration and Longwear in B00, against Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Fair 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair 2Closest overall alternativeB00How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%80#f1dab7#ffe2c2Close colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 86/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.