Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 Rich 3 dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.2 (355)·Very deep · Neutral · neutral pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (51%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same light coverage· No fragrance listed
Differences: No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same light coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same light coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very deep with yellow undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for deeper skin with warm undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (cool vs neutral)· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · No SPF
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (cool vs neutral)· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very deep with rosy undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
34
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deepest with golden undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
40
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
40
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with bronze neutral undertones
The closest shade to Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 Rich 3 (Very deep · Neutral · neutral pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Make Up For Ever Balancing & Perfecting Natural Finish Longwear Foundation in 476N Umber, against Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Rich 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRich 3Closest shade match476N UmberHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%91#65350f#613213Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Overall match 76/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tarte Babassu Foundcealer Dewy Foundation SPF 20 in 59N Rich Neutral, against Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Rich 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRich 3Closest overall alternative59N Rich NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%79#65350f#67351bClose colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Overall match 87/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.