Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 Golden 3 dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.2 (355)·Medium · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
$42Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (14%)3.5 (88)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium to tan skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same olive undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Light-medium rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Light-medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Light-medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (49%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Very close colour· Same olive undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium deep with olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Luminous rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Luminous rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Same olive undertone· Same radiant finish· Same light coverage
Differences: No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Medium with golden olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium with golden undertones
$41Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (16%)4.3 (1,733)
Matches: Same light coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium-tan with a neutral undertone
Matches: Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly lighter· Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same olive undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
80
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium to tan shade, warm undertone
Matches: Same olive undertone· Same light coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: tan deep with warm bronze undertones
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (49%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Very close colour· Same olive undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Same olive undertone· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral olive undertones
$41Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (16%)4.5 (2,588)
Matches: Same light coverage· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
The closest shade to Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 Golden 3 (Medium · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint in 14, against Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Golden 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGolden 3Closest shade match14How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#c58f53#bf8d5aVery close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 82/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Chanel LES BEIGES Healthy Glow Foundation Hydration and Longwear in BO73, against Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Golden 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGolden 3Closest overall alternativeBO73How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%86#c58f53#cc9661Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92MediumMediumSameDepth difference: 3.8
Retailer descriptionNot statedDeepNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 86/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (14%)
Sephora
