Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 Fair 3 dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.2 (355)·Very fair · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No long-wear claim· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral tones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: fair skin with cool rosy undertones
$12.59$17.99Ulta Beauty$36.41 less (74%)4.2 (5,328)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Full rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
81
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
38
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair skin with cool rosy undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Ultra Fair skin with beige undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same light coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
40
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/normal skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (55%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Very close colour· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair to light with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same light coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
34
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair with white-pink undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair to light with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim 12-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
39
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
The closest shade to Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 Fair 3 (Very fair · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Givenchy Prisme Libre Glow Serum Blurring Foundation in 2N, against Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Fair 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair 3Closest shade match2NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#fddfcc#f7dbc8Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 78/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Dior Backstage Glow-Up Skin Tint Hydrating Tinted Moisturizer SPF 20 in 1.5N, against Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Fair 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair 3Closest overall alternative1.5NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#fddfcc#fcdbc3Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 86/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.