Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 Light 1 dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.2 (355)·Very fair · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$41 less (84%)4.5 (40,486)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim colour stability· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/normal skin
Retailer shade note: fair complexion with warm yellow undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/normal skin
Retailer shade note: light complexion with warm yellow undertone
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$41 less (84%)4.5 (40,486)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Fair shade with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same light coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: L1.5 - Light with warm undertones, and a yellow tone
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Full rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same light coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: L2 - Light with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: L3 - Light with warm undertones, and a light yellow tone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (55%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· No fragrance listed
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
78
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair or light skin tones with a yellow undertone
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$24 less (49%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair to light skin with cool, pink or rosy undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same light coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Ultra Fair skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
The closest shade to Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 Light 1 (Very fair · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix Powder Plus Foundation in NC13, against Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Light 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLight 1Closest shade matchNC13How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%98#f6dbba#faddbbLooks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Overall match 77/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Maybelline Fit Me Dewy + Smooth Foundation in 110 Porcelain, against Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Light 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLight 1Closest overall alternative110 PorcelainHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#f6dbba#ffe3c2Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Overall match 87/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.