Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 Light 280 N dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (2,230)·Medium · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$4.01 less (25%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Not marketed for combination/dry skin
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
34
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$4.01 less (25%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
34
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 Light 280 N (Medium · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
SIIA Cosmetics Flawless Glow Cushion Foundation in N09 Veil, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 in Light 280 N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLight 280 NClosest shade matchN09 VeilHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#d39b68#d59b6dVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 4 compared78
Finish35%78RadiantLuminousCloseLuminous finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%—not comparableFullNot listedNot comparedCoverage not listed for one product
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Combination, dry, normal, oilyNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Juvia's Place I am Magic Natural Radiance Foundation in 530 Ibiza, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 in Light 280 N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLight 280 NClosest overall alternative530 IbizaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%93#d39b68#db9c67Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Overall match 90/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.