Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 Rich 620 W dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (2,230)·Deep tan · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
46
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
46
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
75
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry skin · No SPF
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as rich deep· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
92
Looks identical · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as rich deep · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium to deep skin with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as rich deep
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as rich deep· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
92
Looks identical · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as rich deep · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium to deep skin with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as rich deep
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as rich deep· Buildable rather than full coverage· Contains listed fragrance
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as rich deep · Buildable rather than full coverage · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium to deep skin with warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as rich deep
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Described as deep, yours as rich deep· Medium rather than full coverage· Not marketed for combination/normal skin
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
46
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as deep, yours as rich deep · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep complexion with warm golden undertone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as deep, yours as rich deep
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as deep, yours as rich deep· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as deep, yours as rich deep · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for normal skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: hazelnut - dark brown skin with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as deep, yours as rich deep
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as rich deep· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
75
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium tan, yours as rich deep · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: M5.5 - medium-deep to deep with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as rich deep
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 Rich 620 W (Deep tan · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
ColourPop Pretty Fresh Hyaluronic Hydrating Foundation in Deep Dark 185W, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 in Rich 620 W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRich 620 WClosest shade matchDeep Dark 185WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%98#a76942#a46944Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Overall match 80/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Studio Radiance Serum Powered Foundation in NC50, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 in Rich 620 W. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRich 620 WClosest overall alternativeNC50How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#a76942#ac6e46Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Overall match 87/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $30 more
Sephora
