Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 Rich 660 N dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (2,230)·Deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Not marketed for combination skin
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
46
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep with darker cool red undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
25
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · No SPF
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
69
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: very deep cool skin with red undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
46
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
46
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Extra deep with cool undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
35
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
75
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Not marketed for dry skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
92
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · No SPF
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 Rich 660 N (Deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Ami Colé Skin-Enhancing Lightweight & Blurring Foundation Stick in 110, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 in Rich 660 N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRich 660 NClosest shade match110How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#724e40#735246Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.9
Retailer descriptionRich deepRich deepBoth described as rich deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 78/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Make Up For Ever HD Skin Hydra Glow Hydrating Foundation in 4R76 - Cool Ebony, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Hydrating CC Cream SPF 30 in Rich 660 N. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Overall match 85/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.