CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum Deep Cool dupes and alternatives IT Cosmetics
4.4 (7,609)·Deep · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
56
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
30
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with cool-neutral undertones
Differences: Slightly deeper· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Retailer shade note: dark-deep shade, red undertone
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for deep to very deep skin with neutral undertones
$38Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (3%)4.0 (122)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No SPF
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: rich espresso with red undertones for deep dark skin
The closest shade to IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum Deep Cool (Deep · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Yves Saint Laurent Skin Affair Soft Glow Cushion Foundation in DC11, against IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum in Deep Cool. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep CoolClosest shade matchDC11How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#7c5641#7d5946Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.5
Retailer descriptionVery deepDeepSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0Dry, oily, sensitiveNormalMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 85/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rabanne Fresh Touch 24H Radiant Foundation in 80C, against IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum in Deep Cool. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep CoolClosest overall alternative80CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%78#7c5641#7f4f3dClose colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 2.1
Retailer descriptionVery deepDeepSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 86/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.