CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum Light Neutral dupes and alternatives IT Cosmetics
4.4 (7,609)·Very fair · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Ultra Fair skin with beige undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same radiant finish
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light to medium with neutral-peach undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair skin with cool rosy undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light to medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light to medium with warm undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair skin with cool rosy undertones
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$26.01 less (67%)4.4 (41,209)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
The closest shade to IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum Light Neutral (Very fair · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Maybelline Fit Me Matte + Poreless Foundation in Natural Ivory 112, against IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum in Light Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLight NeutralClosest shade matchNatural Ivory 112How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#f3d3bd#f8d5bcLooks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared50
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared80
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall30
Skin type100%30Dry, oily, sensitiveNormal, oilyBoth marketed for oily skin
Overall match 79/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Maybelline Super Stay 24H Skin Tint + Vitamin C in 102, against IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum in Light Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLight NeutralClosest overall alternative102How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#f3d3bd#f8dac6Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 92/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.