CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum Medium Tan dupes and alternatives IT Cosmetics
4.4 (7,609)·Light · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
56
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
56
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: natural beige shade with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
30
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: M2.25 - Medium with neutral undertones, and a peach tone
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (59%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
30
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
30
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims not settling into lines· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
30
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 34% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· No fragrance listed
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium or tan skin tones with a neutral undertone
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
56
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Described as light, yours as medium tan· Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as light, yours as medium tan · Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Not marketed for oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light with cool undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as light, yours as medium tan
The closest shade to IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum Medium Tan (Light · Warm · golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
CoverGirl Olay Simply Ageless 3-in-1 Liquid Foundation in Warm Beige, against IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum in Medium Tan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium TanClosest shade matchWarm BeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#ebb899#e9ba9eLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.6
Retailer descriptionMedium tanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 79/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
L'Oréal Paris Lumi Le Glow Skin Tint in C140, against IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum in Medium Tan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium TanClosest overall alternativeC140How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#ebb899#e6b496Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference: 2.2
Retailer descriptionMedium tanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 88/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$25.01 less (64%)
Sephora
