CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum Fair Light dupes and alternatives IT Cosmetics
4.4 (7,609)·Very fair · Cool · rosy undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair skin with cool rosy undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very fair, cool-neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
30
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: ivory pink shade with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair to light skin with cool, pink or rosy undertones
The closest shade to IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum Fair Light (Very fair · Cool · rosy undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear Care and Glow Foundation in 110C, against IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum in Fair Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair LightClosest shade match110CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#f9d1be#f6d0bbLooks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared68
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall28
Skin type100%28Dry, oily, sensitiveNormal, combination, sensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
LIXR Beauty Multi-Use Cream-to-Powder Concealer & Foundation Stick in Chestnut 2C, against IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum in Fair Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair LightClosest overall alternativeChestnut 2CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#f9d1be#f8d3bdVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared100
Finish35%—not comparableRadiantNot listedNot comparedFinish not listed for one product
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Dry, oily, sensitiveDry, combination, oilyBoth marketed for dry/oily skin
Overall match 96/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (36%)
