CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum Deep Mocha dupes and alternatives IT Cosmetics
4.4 (7,609)·Deep · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a lightweight feel· No fragrance listed
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 32% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deep skin with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: cool, rich brown with subtle neutral tones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Retailer shade note: dark brown skin w/ neutral undertones
The closest shade to IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum Deep Mocha (Deep · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Tower 28 Beauty Swipe Serum Non-Acnegenic Foundation in 17R Santa Ynez, against IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum in Deep Mocha. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep MochaClosest match17R Santa YnezHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%98#915f3f#8f5d3cLooks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.2
Retailer descriptionVery deepDeepSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared86
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared80
Longevity30%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall33
Skin type100%33Dry, oily, sensitiveSensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 89/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$21.01 less (54%)
