CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum Light Cool dupes and alternatives IT Cosmetics
4.4 (7,609)·Fair · Cool · pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair skin with cool rosy undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light to medium with cool undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light skin with pink undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: fair with cool pink undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Retailer shade note: level-two fair with a cool undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair to light skin with cool, pink or rosy undertones
The closest shade to IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum Light Cool (Fair · Cool · pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Tarte Face Tape Full Coverage Foundation in 20B Light Beige, against IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum in Light Cool. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLight CoolClosest shade match20B Light BeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall100
Colour60%99#f1ccb7#f0cbb6Looks identicalColour difference 0.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99FairFairSameDepth difference: 0.5
Retailer descriptionLightLightBoth described as lightThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%80MediumFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared61
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall28
Skin type100%28Dry, oily, sensitiveNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for oily skin
Overall match 76/100Shade match 100/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
LIXR Beauty Multi-Use Cream-to-Powder Concealer & Foundation Stick in Chestnut 2C, against IT Cosmetics CC+ Nude Glow Lightweight Foundation + Glow Serum in Light Cool. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLight CoolClosest overall alternativeChestnut 2CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%94#f1ccb7#f8d3bdVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93FairVery fairCloseDepth difference: 3.6
Retailer descriptionLightLightBoth described as lightThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared100
Finish35%—not comparableRadiantNot listedNot comparedFinish not listed for one product
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Dry, oily, sensitiveDry, combination, oilyBoth marketed for dry/oily skin
Overall match 95/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.