Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation 14T dupes and alternatives Lawless
4.4 (545)·Light medium · Neutral · neutral pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan complexion with warm golden undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (cool vs neutral)· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No long-wear claim· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
40
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
56
Looks identical · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$28.01 less (60%)4.2 (18,317)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
56
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
40
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same natural finish· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
56
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
56
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Described as medium, yours as tan· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as tan · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: Medium with olive undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as tan
The closest shade to Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation 14T (Light medium · Neutral · neutral pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris True Match Super-Blendable Foundation in N4 Neutral Light Medium, against Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation in 14T. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade14TClosest shade matchN4 Neutral Light MediumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%97#dcab8a#dfaa87Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 82/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Live Tinted HUESTICK Complexion Stick in 12 Medium, against Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation in 14T. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade14TClosest overall alternative12 MediumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%95#dcab8a#daa683Looks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Overall match 85/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$31 less (66%)
Sephora
