Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation 3F dupes and alternatives Lawless
4.4 (545)·Very fair · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light with neutral peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: L2 - very light with neutral undertones
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$35.01 less (74%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
30
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for very fair skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same full coverage
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: fair or light skin tones with a yellow undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for fair to light skin with yellow undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
$6.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$40.01 less (85%)3.8 (142)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation 3F (Very fair · Warm · golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris True Match Super-Blendable Foundation in W1 Warm Light, against Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation in 3F. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3FClosest shade matchW1 Warm LightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#f7d2b8#f4d0b6Looks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 84/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Smashbox Dual Filter 2-In-1 Longwearing Concealer + Foundation in Fair Light 5 Neutral, against Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation in 3F. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3FClosest overall alternativeFair Light 5 NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%97#f7d2b8#f3cfb7Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Very fairFairCloseDepth difference: 1.5
Retailer descriptionFairFairBoth described as fairThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 88/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$5 less (11%)
Sephora
