Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation 2.75F dupes and alternatives Lawless
4.4 (545)·Light medium · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$42Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (11%)3.4 (2,267)
Matches: Very close colour· Same olive undertone· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
56
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$33.01 less (70%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$33 less (70%)3.5 (10)
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel· No drying alcohol listed
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: fair or light skin tones with a neutral undertone
$29Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (38%)4.6 (558)
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
56
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Light with Warm Yellow Undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: fair-to-light shade with warm undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
87
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: fair medium with neutral undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$39 less (83%)4.5 (40,486)
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$39 less (83%)4.5 (40,486)
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
28
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
56
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
49
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Light rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for sensitive skin
The closest shade to Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation 2.75F (Light medium · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris True Match Super-Blendable Foundation in W6.5 Warm Medium, against Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation in 2.75F. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade2.75FClosest shade matchW6.5 Warm MediumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%94#d9b785#d6b17eVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 80/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kosas Revealer Skin-Improving Foundation SPF 25 in Light+ Neutral Olive 160, against Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation in 2.75F. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade2.75FClosest overall alternativeLight+ Neutral Olive 160How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%84#d9b785#e5c392Close colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%60FullMediumSome differenceMedium coverage rather than full
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared80
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall28
Skin type100%28Combination, oily, sensitiveNormal, dry, combinationBoth marketed for combination skin
Overall match 83/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.