Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (cool vs neutral)· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: fair complexion with cool rosy undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (cool vs neutral)· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (cool vs neutral)· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
$35Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (26%)4.5 (732)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: fair with cool neutral undertones
The closest shade to Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation 1F (Very fair · Neutral · neutral pink undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Essence Foundation Stick in 10, against Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation in 1F. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade1FClosest shade match10How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#fbdacb#fcd9c8Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Overall match 79/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Smashbox Dual Filter 2-In-1 Longwearing Concealer + Foundation in Fair 1 Cool, against Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation in 1F. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade1FClosest overall alternativeFair 1 CoolHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%94#fbdacb#fddac7Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 90/100Shade match 93/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $3 more
Walmart
