Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation 7L dupes and alternatives Lawless
4.4 (545)·Light · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$35.01 less (74%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
30
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$32 less (68%)3.9 (223)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: For light skin tones with a warm neutral undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same full coverage
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Medium rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
28
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Buildable rather than full coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
37
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than full coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation 7L (Light · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Ciele tint & PROTECT medium coverage serum foundation in 03 | Light, against Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation in 7L. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade7LClosest match03 | LightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall100
Colour60%100#eec1a0#eec1a0Looks identicalColour difference 0.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.0
Retailer descriptionLight mediumLightSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Coverage30%80FullMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared60
Longevity30%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Combination, oily, sensitiveNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for combination/oily skin
Overall match 91/100Shade match 100/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $1 more
