Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow Bisque dupes and alternatives Makeup By Mario
4.3 (1,328)·Peach · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than peach· Liquid rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than peach · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Golden rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Golden rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than peach· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than peach · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (64%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
42
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (64%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Dreamsicle, against Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Bisque. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBisqueClosest matchDreamsicleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%82#d9b593#dfbba1Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedDryNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 88/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $1 more
Ulta Beauty
