Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow Brown Sugar dupes and alternatives Makeup By Mario
4.3 (1,328)·Bronze · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Peach rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: maple sparkle, sunset sparkle
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Copper rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Copper rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Copper rather than bronze· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Copper rather than bronze · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Powder rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: sparkling gold with multi-colored pearl
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than bronze· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than bronze · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Copper rather than bronze· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than bronze · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: champagne sparkle with pink flip pearl, copper sparkle with pink flip pearl
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than bronze· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
42
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than bronze · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: rich caramel with neutral undertones
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Copper rather than bronze· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than bronze · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than bronze· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than bronze · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than bronze · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
$23Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (8%)4.3 (828)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Copper rather than bronze· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than bronze · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than bronze· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than bronze · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than bronze
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Terracotta rather than bronze· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than bronze · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
DIBS Beauty Duet Baked Bronzer in Spiced Chai, against Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Brown Sugar. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBrown SugarClosest shade matchSpiced ChaiHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%81#b6764f#b4795dClose colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared63
Finish65%70ShimmerDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MERIT Solo Shadow Cream Eyeshadow in Vachetta, against Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Brown Sugar. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBrown SugarClosest overall alternativeVachettaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour60%84#b6764f#b1795cClose colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 85/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$9 less (36%)
