Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow Mauve Magic dupes and alternatives Makeup By Mario
4.3 (1,328)·Bronze · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Copper rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream
Differences: Rose rather than bronze· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than bronze · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than bronze· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than bronze · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Pink rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a greyish taupe with a hint of shimmer.
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than bronze· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than bronze · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than bronze· Powder rather than cream (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than bronze · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a shimmering medium pink / a blackened cherry
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than bronze· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than bronze · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than bronze· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than bronze · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Marc Jacobs Beauty Born Star Cream-to-Powder Long-Wear Eyeshadow in 210 Clapback, against Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Mauve Magic. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMauve MagicClosest match210 ClapbackHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#d99691#d0948cVery close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BronzeBronzeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall65
Finish65%61ShimmerDuochromeSome differenceDuochrome finish rather than shimmer
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $5 more
