Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow Sandstone dupes and alternatives Makeup By Mario
4.3 (1,328)·Pink · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.01 less (44%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same format: cream
Differences: Lighter· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Nude rather than pink· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than pink · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Copper rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.01 less (44%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same format: cream
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than pink· Powder rather than cream (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than pink · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than pink· Powder rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than pink · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Charlotte Tilbury Eyes To Mesmerise Cream Eyeshadow in Champagne, against Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Sandstone. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSandstoneClosest matchChampagneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%86#bd917c#c29988Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92MediumLightCloseDepth difference 4.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall88
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Overall match 91/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $14 more
