Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow Pink Pearl dupes and alternatives Makeup By Mario
4.3 (1,328)·Pink · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a greyish taupe with a hint of shimmer.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than pink· Powder rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than pink · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: white aurora (light coral glitter) , coral starlight (coral peach matte), Flaming Sunset (neutral peach brown matte)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
L'Oréal Paris Le Shadow Stick in Alluring Rose, against Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Pink Pearl. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePink PearlClosest shade matchAlluring RoseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%87#d5a392#cd9f8aVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 83/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Rosegold, against Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Pink Pearl. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePink PearlClosest overall alternativeRosegoldHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%92#d5a392#cfa496Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $3 more
