Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow Bronze Baddie dupes and alternatives Makeup By Mario
4.3 (1,328)·Brown · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Nude rather than brown· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Copper rather than brown· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than brown · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: champagne sparkle with pink flip pearl, copper sparkle with pink flip pearl
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Copper rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Gelato, against Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Bronze Baddie. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBronze BaddieClosest matchGelatoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%92#b7846d#b27e66Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 90/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $9 more
