Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow Blush dupes and alternatives Makeup By Mario
4.3 (1,328)·Pink · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: crushed pearl (shimmer), cool khaki, brown sugar
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: peach pink with hot pink sparkle
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (40%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: sparkling pink with multi-colored pearl
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
39
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Revlon Glimmer Eyeshadow Multi-Stick in Swipe Right, against Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Blush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBlushClosest shade matchSwipe RightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#bd7d75#bb7e74Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared32
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Overall match 79/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in Rosy Cheeks, against Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Blush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBlushClosest overall alternativeRosy CheeksHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#bd7d75#c07671Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Overall match 92/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $14 more
