Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow Sienna dupes and alternatives Makeup By Mario
4.3 (1,328)·Brown · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
32
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Strip Down, against Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Sienna. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSiennaClosest shade matchStrip DownHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#8a5138#864f38Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall41
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 76/100Shade match 97/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MERIT Solo Shadow Cream Eyeshadow in Sartorial, against Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Sienna. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSiennaClosest overall alternativeSartorialHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall77
Colour60%72#8a5138#7a523eClose colourColour difference 4.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 84/100Shade match 77/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $4 more
Ulta Beauty
Walgreens
