Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow Fizzy Fig dupes and alternatives Makeup By Mario
4.3 (1,328)·Mauve · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: crushed pearl (shimmer), cool khaki, brown sugar
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Liquid rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (40%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than mauve· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than mauve · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
e.l.f. Cosmetics Bite Size Eyeshadow Palette in Take Your Pink, against Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Fizzy Fig. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFizzy FigClosest matchTake Your PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#ba7969#c27a6dVery close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall81
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Overall match 85/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautySame price
Sephora
