Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow Honey Crystal dupes and alternatives Makeup By Mario
4.3 (1,328)·Golden · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: glitter· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: cream
Differences: Silver rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish, pigmentation & format
18
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Kaja Wink Dazzle Dual-Ended Eyeshadow Stick in Champagne Sequin, against Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Honey Crystal. Matched on pan 4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHoney CrystalClosest matchChampagne SequinHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%95#e5be9b#e1b998Looks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 92/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.