Liqua-Play Eye Shadow Crema Matte dupes and alternatives Stila
4.8 (290)·Taupe · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Grey rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than taupe· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than taupe · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (32%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Golden rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than taupe· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than taupe · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 68S Tobacco, against Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Crema Matte. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCrema MatteClosest shade match68S TobaccoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%97#d1a289#d09f87Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 75/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 30M Cedar, against Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Crema Matte. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCrema MatteClosest overall alternative30M CedarHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%77#d1a289#c2957dClose colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%81LightMediumSome differenceDepth difference 7.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Overall match 88/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $14 more
Ulta Beauty
