Liqua-Play Eye Shadow Purple Peep Matte dupes and alternatives Stila
4.8 (290)·Purple · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (32%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than purple· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than purple · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than purple· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than purple · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (64%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
36
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (40%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: Lighter· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$14.50 less (58%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
24
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than purple · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
40
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Duochrome rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
16
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Duochrome rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Mauve rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
27
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Mauve rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than purple· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than purple · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
22
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than purple· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than purple · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than purple· Glitter rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than purple · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format)
Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Garden, against Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Purple Peep Matte. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePurple Peep MatteClosest shade matchGardenHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%74#c3a7cb#d3a5cbClose colourColour difference 4.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared13
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared59
Longevity50%70Long-wearing8-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 8-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 59/100Shade match 84/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Sephora Collection Sephora Colorful Waterproof Eyeshadow & Eyeliner Multi-Stick in 12 Periwinkle Matte, against Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Purple Peep Matte. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePurple Peep MatteClosest overall alternative12 Periwinkle MatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall74
Colour60%57#c3a7cb#d89fc7Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared90
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%45LiquidStickSome differenceStick rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 75/100Shade match 74/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.