Liqua-Play Eye Shadow Fawn Matte dupes and alternatives Stila
4.8 (290)·Brown · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Copper rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
16
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: warm brown with silver sparkle
MAC Cosmetics Matte Eyeshadow in Charcoal Brown, against Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Fawn Matte. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFawn MatteClosest shade matchCharcoal BrownHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%87#b08769#a9826aVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall19
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%70Long-wearing8-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 8-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 66/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Jane Iredale PurePressed Eye Shadow Triple in Driftwood, against Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Fawn Matte. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFawn MatteClosest overall alternativeDriftwoodHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%75#b08769#b2907bClose colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91MediumMediumSameDepth difference 4.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared85
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $5 more
