Liqua-Play Eye Shadow Kitten Karma Glitter dupes and alternatives Stila
4.8 (290)·Golden · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: glitter· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: peachy beige with champagne sparkle
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Cream rather than liquid (format)· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$13.01 less (52%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: champagne sparkle with pink flip pearl, copper sparkle with pink flip pearl
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Nude rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Nude rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Rose rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Sorbetto, against Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Kitten Karma Glitter. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeKitten Karma GlitterClosest shade matchSorbettoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%91#d2a48f#cca594Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared59
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow in Comet, against Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Kitten Karma Glitter. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeKitten Karma GlitterClosest overall alternativeCometHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%85#d2a48f#dcad93Close colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%89LightLightSameDepth difference 4.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared86
Finish65%83GlitterMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall88
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Overall match 88/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$13 less (52%)
