Liqua-Play Eye Shadow Diamond Dust Glitter dupes and alternatives Stila
4.8 (290)·Silver · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.01 less (44%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same finish: glitter
Differences: Deeper· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: White rather than silver· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: White rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· White rather than silver· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · White rather than silver · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: White rather than silver· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: White rather than silver· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: White rather than silver· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: opaque silver with silver pearl
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than silver · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (72%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (64%)4.2 (2,863)
Shimmer · Buildable
Differences: White rather than silver· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than silver · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (72%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than silver· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: icy taupe with silver and pink pinpoints
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (72%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Nude rather than silver· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: warm beige with multi-colored glitter
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than silver · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Nude rather than silver· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than silver · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than silver· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than silver · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (76%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than silver · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than silver· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than silver · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same pigmentation: sheer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than silver· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than silver · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· White rather than silver· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · White rather than silver · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than silver· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than silver · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: sheer· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Blue rather than silver· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Duochrome · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Blue rather than silver · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: sparkling transparent icy blue with duo-chrome reflects
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
9
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Revlon Glimmer Liquid Shadow in UFGlow, against Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Diamond Dust Glitter. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDiamond Dust GlitterClosest shade matchUFGlowHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%82#d5cbbd#dccec4Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 2.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall72
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format15%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kaja Wink Dazzle Dual-Ended Eyeshadow Stick in Ice Illusion, against Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Diamond Dust Glitter. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDiamond Dust GlitterClosest overall alternativeIce IllusionHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%69#d5cbbd#ddc9bdSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared93
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.01 less (44%)
