Liqua-Play Eye Shadow Wanderlust Glitter dupes and alternatives Stila
4.8 (290)·Golden · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: glitter
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: peachy beige with champagne sparkle
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: pale neutral with a silvery gold sparkle
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: burnt Bronze metallic with golden sands glimmer/
holographic rustic metal foil with shifts of pink & gold sparkle
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: glitter
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
57
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: glitter· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: rose gold metallic with warm honey shimmer/
light champagne foil with gold & silver sparkle
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (64%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than golden· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than golden · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a shimmering neutral beige / a rich navy blue
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Milani Gilded Eyeshadow Sticks in Sand, against Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Wanderlust Glitter. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWanderlust GlitterClosest matchSandHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#cba995#c4a793Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Finish65%83GlitterMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 87/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$3 less (12%)
