Liqua-Play Eye Shadow Kitten Shimmer dupes and alternatives Stila
4.8 (290)·Golden · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Deeper· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: pale neutral with a silvery gold sparkle
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Peach rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Peach rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: crushed pearl (shimmer), cool khaki, brown sugar
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: champagne sparkle with pink flip pearl, copper sparkle with pink flip pearl
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
63
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (40%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Very close colour
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Alien, against Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Kitten Shimmer. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeKitten ShimmerClosest shade matchAlienHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#eabbad#e5b6a7Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall77
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%60LiquidCreamSome differenceCream rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedDryNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Sacheu Long Wear Liquid Eyeshadow STAY-N in Candy Dipp’d, against Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Kitten Shimmer. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeKitten ShimmerClosest overall alternativeCandy Dipp’dHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%76#eabbad#d7ada0Close colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%78LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 7.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Overall match 87/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$8 less (32%)
