Matte Fluid Eye Paint Dionysus dupes and alternatives about-face
4.2 (339)·Purple · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than purple· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Plum rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Plum rather than purple · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than purple· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Pink rather than purple· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than purple · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than purple· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
34
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Pink rather than purple· Duochrome rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
26
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than purple · Duochrome rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sparkling flamingo pink with an opalescent shift
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
39
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Claims comfort
Differences: Pink rather than purple· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than purple · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
18
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: light purple with gold glitter
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Lavender Slip, against about-face Matte Fluid Eye Paint in Dionysus. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDionysusClosest shade matchLavender SlipHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour60%58#c2798d#ab808dSlight colour differenceColour difference 6.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall39
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 60/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
florence by mills Eye Candy Eyeshadow Stick in Candy Floss, against about-face Matte Fluid Eye Paint in Dionysus. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDionysusClosest overall alternativeCandy FlossHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall71
Colour60%69#c2798d#c1799dSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 77/100Shade match 71/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $6 more
