Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick Antique Rose dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.6 (4,359)·Pink · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Peach rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than pink· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than pink · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
40
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sparkling pink with multi-colored pearl
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Peach rather than pink· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than pink · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Differences: Copper rather than pink· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than pink · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
40
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in Hypebiscus, against Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Antique Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAntique RoseClosest shade matchHypebiscusHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#c4867c#c8837cVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightMediumCloseDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall18
Finish65%0MatteGlitterDifferentGlitter finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 66/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revlon Glimmer Eyeshadow Multi-Stick in Swipe Right, against Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Antique Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAntique RoseClosest overall alternativeSwipe RightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%87#c4867c#bb7e74Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90LightMediumCloseDepth difference 4.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 90/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.