Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick Mulberry dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.6 (4,359)·Brown · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Green rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Green rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Plum rather than brown· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
28
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than brown · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: burgundy metallic with taupe shimmer/copper rose foil with shifts of pink and gold sparkle
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Mauve rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than brown· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than brown · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: taupe topper shimmer with silver flecks
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Taupe rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Taupe rather than brown · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Pink rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
about-face Fractal Glitter Eye Paint in Digital Demise, against Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Mulberry. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMulberryClosest shade matchDigital DemiseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall76
Colour60%60#b8878d#be887fSlight colour differenceColour difference 6.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared85
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 76/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Strike A Rose, against Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Mulberry. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMulberryClosest overall alternativeStrike A RoseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour60%76#b8878d#c08885Close colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 80/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $9 more
