Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick Dusty Mauve dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.6 (4,359)·Purple · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than purple· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than purple · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: bronzed plum with a hint of violet
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Plum rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Plum rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Plum rather than purple· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than purple· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Plum rather than purple· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than purple · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than purple· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than purple · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: warm nudie pink with rainbow sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than purple· 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than purple · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than purple· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than purple · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Mauve rather than purple· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light purple with gold glitter
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than purple· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than purple · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Mauve rather than purple· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than purple · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: medium mauve w/ pink micro glitter
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than purple· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Mauve rather than purple· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Mauve rather than purple · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than purple· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than purple · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Plum rather than purple· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than purple · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
e.l.f. Cosmetics Bite Size Eyeshadow Palette in Rose Water, against Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Dusty Mauve. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDusty MauveClosest shade matchRose WaterHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%93#ab7170#a87073Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Soiree, against Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Dusty Mauve. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDusty MauveClosest overall alternativeSoireeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%66#ab7170#966e6fSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90MediumMediumSameDepth difference 4.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall93
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Overall match 84/100Shade match 78/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.