Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick Golden Pink dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.6 (4,359)·Peach · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (26%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Lighter· Copper rather than peach· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Copper rather than peach · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than peach· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than peach · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 15-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Copper rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: champagne sparkle with pink flip pearl, copper sparkle with pink flip pearl
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Copper rather than peach· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 38% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Copper rather than peach · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than peach· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than peach · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Copper rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$22.01 less (65%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than peach
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sparkling gold with multi-colored pearl
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Lighter· Copper rather than peach· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Copper rather than peach · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Copper rather than peach· Dewy rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Copper rather than peach · Dewy rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than peach· Dewy rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Very close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than peach · Dewy rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: rich caramel bronze / tan marble glow
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than peach· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than peach · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Brown rather than peach· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than peach · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Copper rather than peach· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than peach · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than peach· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
47
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than peach · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: rich caramel with neutral undertones
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)4.5 (1,590)
Matches: Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than peach
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Copper rather than peach· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Copper rather than peach · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Sandy Matte, against Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Golden Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGolden PinkClosest shade matchSandy MatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%86#c07a58#c0765bVery close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 68/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MERIT Solo Shadow Cream Eyeshadow in Vachetta, against Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Golden Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGolden PinkClosest overall alternativeVachettaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%81#c07a58#b1795cClose colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.