Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick Smokey Topaz dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.6 (4,359)·Silver · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Grey rather than silver· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than silver · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic
Differences: Bronze rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than silver · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than silver· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than silver · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (82%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than silver· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than silver · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than silver· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than silver · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (56%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Taupe rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 38% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Taupe rather than silver · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Grey rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Copper rather than silver· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 38% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Copper rather than silver · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than silver· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than silver · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Brown rather than silver· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than silver · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than silver· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 38% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than silver · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Natural rather than metallic (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Natural rather than metallic (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same format: stick
Differences: Brown rather than silver· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than silver · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow in Champagne Trail, against Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Smokey Topaz. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSmokey TopazClosest matchChampagne TrailHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%92#9d7863#a17661Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%33Normal, Dry, CombinationNormalDifferentBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 82/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.