Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick Moonstone dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.6 (4,359)·Golden · Neutral · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (26%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer gold with multi-color sparkle
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: glitter· Claims hydration
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (26%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: champagne sparkle with pink flip pearl, copper sparkle with pink flip pearl
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Peach rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Peach rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Silver rather than golden· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Silver rather than golden · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Normal rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: sheer silver with mutli-pearl glitter
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Peach rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Peach rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Taupe rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Taupe rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
18
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Revlon Glimmer Eyeshadow Multi-Stick in Ghosted, against Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Moonstone. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMoonstoneClosest shade matchGhostedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%95#d5b4a5#d3b19fLooks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish65%68GlitterShimmerSome differenceShimmer finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in CHAMPAGNE ICE, against Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Moonstone. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMoonstoneClosest overall alternativeCHAMPAGNE ICEHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%85#d5b4a5#d8b3a9Very close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall93
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall50
Longevity50%3524-hour wear12-hour wearDifferent12-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 86/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.50 less (69%)
