Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick Mica dupes and alternatives Bobbi Brown
4.6 (4,359)·Nude · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick
Differences: 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: Earthy Glam (taupe beige glitter), Wood Breeze (olive beige brown shimmer), Night Haze (deep khaki brown matte)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: peachy beige with champagne sparkle
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than nude· 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than nude · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than nude· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than nude · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
28
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: taupe metallic with warm silvery shimmer/
holographic foil with shifts of pink, silver & gold sparkle
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: taupe with gold & silver sparkle
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than nude· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
28
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than nude · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: burnt Bronze metallic with golden sands glimmer/
holographic rustic metal foil with shifts of pink & gold sparkle
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Satin rather than metallic (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than metallic (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Forest Night, against Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Mica. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMicaClosest shade matchForest NightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#b99d88#b99e8cLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared11
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 63/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Bobbi Brown Dual-Ended Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Silk / Rich Navy, against Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Mica. Matched on the Silk pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMicaClosest overall alternativeSilk / Rich NavyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#b99d88#c3a18bVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNeutralUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 96/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $9 more
Walmart
