True Skin Serum Foundation Flores SF13.5 dupes and alternatives ILIA
4.2 (2,657)·Very deep · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$50Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (11%)4.3 (1,131)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: D2 - Deep with warm undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
28
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with very warm, rosy undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same medium coverage
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: extra deep with warm golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for normal skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: Extra deep with golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deeper skin with neutral warm undertones
The closest shade to ILIA True Skin Serum Foundation Flores SF13.5 (Very deep · Warm · golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Lawless Forget The Filler Skin-Plumping Line-Smoothing Foundation in 30D, against ILIA True Skin Serum Foundation in Flores SF13.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFlores SF13.5Closest shade match30DHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#794534#754433Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%80MediumFullCloseFull coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared80
Longevity30%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall28
Skin type100%28Normal, dry, sensitiveCombination, oily, sensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 89/100Shade match 98/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tarte Timeless Hydrating Foundation in 57H Rich Honey, against ILIA True Skin Serum Foundation in Flores SF13.5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFlores SF13.5Closest overall alternative57H Rich HoneyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#794534#7e4733Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Very deepDeepCloseDepth difference: 1.7
Retailer descriptionVery deepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 89/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$18 less (32%)
