Color Tattoo Longwear Multi-Use Eyeshadow Stix I am Rare dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.6 (13,914)·Golden · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
75
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than golden· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than golden · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
36
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
37
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Terracotta rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
36
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Terracotta rather than golden · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Terracotta rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Terracotta rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Tickle Spell, against Maybelline Color Tattoo Longwear Multi-Use Eyeshadow Stix in I am Rare. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeI am RareClosest shade matchTickle SpellHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%89#d5a266#d8aa73Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93LightLightSameDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall25
Finish65%0MatteGlitterDifferentGlitter finish rather than matte
Overall match 65/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Morphe ChromaPlus 12-Pan Eyeshadow Palette in Flickering Sands, against Maybelline Color Tattoo Longwear Multi-Use Eyeshadow Stix in I am Rare. Matched on pan 9. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeI am RareClosest overall alternativeFlickering SandsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%69#d5a266#d29a6dSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 3.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Overall match 80/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $5 more
Sephora
